Did Bush Really Win?

This article: Evidence Mounts That The Vote May Have Been Hacked suggests that Bush might not have won the election on November 2, he might have stolen it. Naturally, I was very skeptical when I first began to read it, expecting democratic sour grapes, but the evidence of possible foul play is fairly persuasive. There seems to a big question out there. The exit polls showed Kerry winning a number of key states that later went to Bush. The Bush side is claiming foul play in the exit polls. Could this be a smokescreen for their own foul play? The anomalies this article points out between counties that used touch screen voting machines that were later tabulated by a single Windows PC and those using optical scanners are difficult if not impossible to explain, other than by foul play.

Before the election, I thought the vote would be close and Ohio would be the crucial state. Being a native Ohioan, where my parents still live, I thought I understood how Ohio would vote in this election and I was certain Kerry would win Ohio and the election. I still cannot believe that Bush won Ohio. Maybe he didn't?

It is not hard to imagine that some people in Bush's camp would be willing to cheat to win an election. They view Kerry and all of liberal stripe as Satan's handmaidens. When you are fighting for God, against the Devil and protecting America from the devil terrorists at the same time, I am sure you would do anything to win for your side. The scary thing that this article seems to show is that cheating would not be that hard to do. Given motive and opportunity, can it really be doubted what was done?